ITU World Triathlon San Diego: Race Day!

Race day! The biggest race of the year with the exception of the Olympics and possibly Kona.

Kristi and I had a nice breakfast down on Mission Beach and are getting ready to head down to the race site for a quick bike course preview, a warm up swim, athlete call downs and and the race start at 2:06PM!

Last night, there was part of a famous speech I remembered, it fits this event perfectly for Kristi:

“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.”

-Theodore Roosevelt

Good luck Kristi. For the rest of your life, you will always know you had the courage to take your place on the start line at the biggest race of your day on American soil.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

ITU World Triathlon San Diego: Day Two

I would like to take a few minutes to clarify how and why Kristi was invited BY USA TRIATHLON to come race at this event. It’s a shame I have to spend time explaining this instead of telling everyone about how awesome of a day this has otherwise been.

 

First and foremost, Kristi has done nothing but train and race as hard as she can, day in and day out. She has had many ups and downs, she struggled through numerous injuries, yet she has the courage to keep going. She has put herself out there in an attempt to do something great. It’s a shame that some triathletes, let alone society has devolved so far that people who have incorrect information (race results, ITU entry process, the process of earning an elite license, etc…) and have never met Kristi feel they have the expertise to launch in personal attacks on such a fine person.

 

So how did Kristi’s name make it on the start list. Here is how the entire process played out:

In order for any card carrying professional triathlete to get their name on the start list of any ITU event, whether it be a Continental Cup race or a WTS race like the one in San Diego, they have to send an email to USA Triathlon asking to have their name added to the start list.  All of this information is passed on to new athletes that earn an elite card. Furthermore, every athlete has the opportunity to receive a monthly newsletter from Jocelyn Buras, the High Performance Coordinator at USA Triathlon, called the “Elite Beat.” In every single edition of this newsletter either Kristi or I have received, the following text is either in the front of the newsletter or near it:

 

“ITU Event Entries/ Withdrawals

Please note that all ITU entry and withdrawal requests must be submitted to your National Federation. If you are an American athlete ALL ENTRY ITU REQUESTS MUST BE SENT TO ituentries@usatriathlon.org. No other form of request will be accepted (including in-person communication or email contact directly with USAT High Performance Staff). Athletes will not be guaranteed that their name has been added to the ITU list unless they email ituentries@usatriathlon.org. USAT deadlines for submission are 5pm Eastern time the Monday before the ITU deadline (32 days prior to competition). The ITU will post each start list 32 days out from competition. After this date, your chances of obtaining a start are decreased based on the number of athletes requesting a start.”

 

In the beginning of 2012, Kristi and I sat down and created a preliminary list of races, draft legal and non-drafting that she wanted to do. The three ITU races she was interested in were Clermont, San Diego and Dallas. At this point, I had Kristi submit her name for each of those races to cover all of our bases in terms of the administrative portion of getting into a race.

 

On April 10th, the ITU released the actual start list of the event here in San Diego, which had only three (3) American females on it instead of the traditional eight (8) for the host country:

  1. Bennett, Laura – USA United States
  2. Haskins, Sarah – USA United States
  3. Jorgensen, Gwen – USA United States

For more information on this, here is a great article covering the entire situation: http://www.slowtwitch.com/News/Olympic_Dreams_In_Peril_2697.html

 

As of May 2nd, the US was up to 7 female slots via a combination of roll down slots and discretionary slots via the ITU. The new start list included:

  1. Bennett, Laura – USA United States
  2. Groff, Sarah – USA United States
  3. Haskins, Sarah – USA United States
  4. Jorgensen, Gwen – USA United States
  5. Petersen, Jillian – USA United States
  6. Shiver, Kaitlin – USA United States
  7. Whitley, Kelly – USA United States

For more information on this development, there is another well written article here: http://www.slowtwitch.com/Interview/The_intricacies_of_Olympic_qualification_2731.html

Last Friday, May 4th, there were two (2) more females added to the list, raising the total to nine (9) American female athletes now on the list:

  1. Bennett, Laura – USA United States
  2. Groff, Sarah – USA United States
  3. Haskins, Sarah – USA United States
  4. Jerdonek, Lindsey – USA United States
  5. Jorgensen, Gwen – USA United States
  6. Parker, Jenna – USA United States
  7. Petersen, Jillian – USA United States
  8. Shiver, Kaitlin – USA United States
  9. Whitley, Kelly – USA United States

 

At some point (probably last Friday), the ITU allotted an additional female slot to the USA. On Tuesday morning, when I spoke with Andy Schmitz on the phone, he explained that an athlete named Marissa Ferrante, had been selected to fill that slot, but at some point last weekend, she apparently was injured in a bike crash.  From there, USA Triathlon needed to fill that 10th slot, but was limited by the ITU as to whom they could choose since the athletes had to already be on the wait list.  As of Tuesday morning, Kristi’s name was next on the list of athletes that were qualified to stand on the start line.

 

For anyone who would be given this chance that says they would not have taken it… they are lying. This is the opportunity of a lifetime for any athlete.

 

I could not be more proud of Kristi than I am right now. Now only has she dealt with the stress of the race, especially on such short notice, but with all of the crap that goes on via the web. Regardless of how she does tomorrow, she will give all she has at that time, on an international stage.

Posted in High Performance, ITU Racing, Olympics, Opinion, Professional Athletes, Uncategorized, USA Triathlon | Leave a comment

USA Triathlon 2012 Olympic Trials: Phoenix’s First Participant

Tuesday, May 8th

After finishing up the U23/Elite track practice at ASU, I checked my email and found one from Andy Schmitz, the High Performance General Manager asking me to call him as soon as I could.

When I was able to get in touch with him, he let me know that he had a slot in the ITU World Triathlon San Diego (WTS event) for Kristi Johnson due to an athlete getting injured last weekend, which removed her from the start list.

After talking on the phone with Kristi, we decided to take the slot- this is the biggest triathlon in 2012 short of the Olympics! The event, which starts on Friday at 2PM PST is the USA Triathlon Olympic Trials event for triathlon! For just about any triathlete in the world, making it onto this start list would be the highlight of their career short of actually making it to the Olympic games! Kristi is the first triathlete from Arizona to have ever made the start list for the triathlon Olympic trials, which is quite an honor!

 

Wednesday, May 9th

Kristi and I linked up early in the morning, hopped in the car and were off to San Diego! We arrived at 3:15 PM in the afternoon and immediately linked up with Andy and Jonathan Hall, the USAT Performance Leader. They quickly gave Kristi her Team USA race suit for the athlete photo shoot!

After the photo shoot, we had an hour to get checked into the suite that was reserved for Kristi. At 5:00 PM, all the athletes linked up and headed over to the Bahia for the Elite Athlete pre-race meeting and then a dinner hosted by the ITU.

It was nice to chat a bit more with Andy and Jonathan, there are quite a few interesting things going on with USA Triathlon that I am involved with!

It was also really nice to have a chance to eat with Kelly Whitley, Nick from the ETA, Jillian Peterson, Sarah Haskins and her husband Nathan Kortuem.

After dinner, we went for a short walk to stretch out our legs and then headed back to the room to watch TV and relax.

 

Thursday, May 10th

The day before a big race is always interesting. We are about to head out for a quick pre-race run, something like a quick 10 minute warm up, then 6×30″ at race pace with a 30″ easy recovery then 10 min. easy.

For more frequent updates, please check the Break Through Multisport Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/BTMSinc) and on Twitter (@BTmultisport)

Posted in Break Through Athletes, High Performance, ITU Racing, Olympics, Professional Athletes, USA Triathlon | Leave a comment

Arizona State University Triathlon- 2012 Season: Year 1

In November of 2011, I had the honor of being hired as the head coach for the Arizona State University triathlon team, which did not leave us a lot of time to prepare for the national championships coming up on April 21st. When I was brought on, it was to build a structured and disciplined “varsity” like program that would be a national powerhouse under the guidance of a nationally respected coach. To understand the magnitude of this task, you would have to fully understand the history of the ASU Cycling and Triathlon (CTC) club over the past few years. In general, I was told the “team” was not much of a “team,” it was a bunch of individuals that simply did what they wanted with no real guidance or structure. Last year, at this same race, the ASU team ended their season ranked 56th in the nation, with the male team ranked as 45th and the female team unranked.  With this as the starting point, I gladly accepted the challenge jumping in with both feet.

CHANGING THE CULTURE

The first goal was to change the culture of the team- the inmates running the asylum was no longer going to be the norm, it would become unacceptable behavior. The first part of this was the agreement with the teams peer-elected leaders: I would have complete and total control over the training and racing of the team to include the ability to remove athletes from training if they were becoming a distraction.

The second part was to build a “team” atmosphere where no one person was bigger than the program; that all of the athletes needed to support their teammates, regardless of their ability. All of this was accomplished with a rather straightforward Code of Conduct, which every team member had to read and sign. As it may be, it is the same code of conduct that I use with my Youth and Junior USA Triathlon High Performance Team and Development Program. The general gist of the code: do the right thing and don’t be an idiot- pretty straightforward right?

After the code of conduct, the general rules were laid out- the team would be required needed to attend the team practices and testing events (unless they had class), follow the team training program and log their workout results on their respective Training Peaks accounts so their training could be monitored.

With all of that in place, I developed a five-year plan to go from 56th in the nation in 2010/11, to winning a national championship. For year one, it was clear there was going to be quite a few “growing pains,” which would be generated primarily by the athletes that are only out for themselves.

 

PROFESSIONAL COACHING AND DEDICATED TRAINING

Along with the organization and the team workouts, the custom training program that was put into place for the entire ASU team gave them access to the cutting edge of science and training that I’ve previously written about such as block periodization.

The group of athletes we started with numbered 30+ with some talented kids in the mix. The goal was to cut the number down to seven males and seven females that would make the “Gold” team, that would represent the university at the Collegiate National Championships in April of 2012, which was 4+ months away. I would provide the professional coaching, all the athletes needed to provide was the dedication to the process.

I devised and implemented a set of “tests” that would have points attributed to them, based off the USA Triathlon Junior benchmark times. The USAT tests included a 200/800 swim test and 1-mile and 2-mile run tests. Several other swim tests, a 5k run and various cycling time trials were added in to round out the testing. After the first month of training, we had separated the serious athletes from the recreational athletes, dropping the number of athletes down to the mid-twenties. We also lost several athletes due to personal choice for items such as schooling and work, which was the correct choice for each.

Within a few weeks of starting the spring semester, a few more athletes had fallen off the roster, leaving us with the serious athletes to choose a nationals team from. By the end of February, we had selected 4 of

the seven members for each team and finished the selections after the conference championships. After the conference championships in Lake Havasu and a few disciplinary issues, the teams had been selected.

During Spring Break, we held a 5-day team training camp in which the team participated in 2-3 workouts a day to include swimming, cycling, running and transition practices. This camp really served to bring the team together, which was a key part of the plan for year one!

With the National Championships coming up at the end of the month, we still have a lot of work to do. At this point, the team members that are left, they have bought into the process. At Nationals, the team stayed focused, worked hard and raced harder. All of the hard work paid off big time!

2011 National Championship Results

Overall: 56th Male: 45th Female: Not ranked

 

2012 National Championship Results

Overall: 23rd Male: 20th Female: 27th

Going into this summer, there are a lot of interesting things in the works with ASU triathlon! The disciplinary issues have been removed, now everyone is on the same page with the direction of the program. Some of the new developments will be made public in greater detail soon, but a quick preview involves the a full recruiting strategy for the existing triathlon program, the NCAA, USA Triathlon, a brand new “draft legal” squad as part of the ASU team and a Collegiate High Performance Team! For more information, please visit www.asutriathlon.com.

Posted in Arizona State University Triathlon, NCAA Sports, Opinion | Leave a comment

Advanced Periodization: Going from Age-Grouper to Professional (Part 5/5)

In post 5, I covered the basics of Block Periodization. In this final part (5 of 5), I’ll layout the basics of Kristi’s training week,  provide more detail on the “realization” phase, with some details on the taper.

The specific goal was to create as many “race-simulation” workouts as we could while monitoring her recovery using such modalities as TRIMP and TSS. The basic week looked like this:

Monday

AM      Hard swim, race pace sets (3000-4000 yards)

PM      Easy run

Tuesday

AM      Hard run session (race pace)

Noon   Long swim (4000-5000 yards)

PM      Ride (Z3 intervals)

Wednesday

AM      CompuTrainer ride (threshold intervals)

Noon   Easy swim with drills

PM      Run (30-60’ Z2/3)

Thursday

AM      Long run (threshold intervals)

PM      Medium Ride (60-90’ w/ short intervals)

 

 

Friday

AM      Hard swim (anaerobic capacity + threshold)

PM      Easy run or ride

Saturday

AM      Brick workout (2.5-3h ride w/ run OTB)

Sunday

AM      Run (variable paces, race simulation)

PM      Easy swim or ride

This phase was the money-maker, Kristi was able to work very hard for three days, take a recovery day, then really hard for 2 days with another recovery. She paid attention to the small things such as recovery and food choices, all of which paid off!

The last phase that we went into was the “realization” phase or the “taper/race” phase. I selected a two-week taper (to include race week) for Kristi, which is the usual duration for an Olympic distance triathlon.

The basic theory of a taper is to reduce the overall volume (40-50% each week) while maintaining the intensity. With Kristi, I scheduled a hard or “key” workout every three (3) days, with two easier days between them. The goal was to stress her (increase her fatigue) every three days with a VERY race-specific session and then let her recover from it.

For Kristi’s taper, that is exactly what we did for the last 2 weeks leading up to Buffalo. We utilized workouts such as 1 km and 2 km running repeats and a lot of intervals at threshold on the bike.

The block periodization that I utilized made all of the difference in Kristi’s training in 2011, which ultimately led to PR after PR and culminated in earning a pro card with 3 months of organized training! I was able to deliver a high level of training stimulus to very specific targets, while ensuring she had the proper amount of time to recovery between different types of workouts. The specificity of the workouts was precisely what she needed to meet the demands of her races and the taper was perfect.  Overall, she trained less and performed more, which is the benefit of working with a coach that truly understands the science behind the training.

Posted in Coaching, High Performance, Periodization, Professional Athletes | Comments Off

Advanced Periodization: Going from Age-Grouper to Professional (Part 4/5)

Sorry for the long delay, the last few months have been very busy getting the Youth and Junior High Performance Team ready for the start of the 2012 season . Here’s part 4 of 5 in the Advanced Periodization series.

In part 3, I wrote that it was very clear, my largest challenge was to design a training program for Kristi that would ensure the following:

  1. She would have the correct amount of energy for each workout, based on the specific workload demands.
  2. She would be able to recover properly between workouts since different physiological systems require different recovery periods
  3. Ensure she would have compatible workouts from a neuromuscular, energetic demand and/or technical complexity.
  4. Ensure her workouts were highly sport-specific in order to meet the demands of the large amounts of training stimulus she would need to earn her pro card.
  5. To provide her with a training program that would allow for multiple peaks throughout 2011.

 

Classical periodization (linear, reverse and/or undulating) has a very hard time providing those benefits to a triathlete that wants to make the most out of their training and reach their full potential.

With those goals in mind, the methodology I have been using for the last 3 years, which has now been termed “block” periodization, would meet all of those goals. The basic principles, using the block periodization terms, are as follows and are also summed up in the calendar graphic below.

 

 

 

 

 

The three basic phases that I used with Kristi are titled the “accumulation” phase, the “transmutation” phase and then the “realization” phase.

In the accumulation phase, my goal was to establish a solid aerobic base and to maximize Kristi’s muscular endurance- the “accumulation” of miles was the goal.  We used a combination of testing methods to include the output:input ratio and calculating fatigue rates to gauge her progress. By mid-August, I was confident that Kristi was not going to be able to increase her aerobic base or muscular endurance.

We built Kristi’s aerobic endurance by training in Zone 2, and used progressively longer Z3 intervals (3-6 x 10-30 minutes) and threshold/Z4 intervals (4-8 x 6-20 minutes) to build Kristi’s muscular endurance (the ability to maintain a given pace/intensity for a longer period of time).

From there, we moved into the transmutation phase, in which our primary goal was to conduct as many high-quality, sport-specific workouts as we could, while allowing Kristi to recover adequately. With that being said, there was a drastic drop in “accumulation,” at this point, I was far more concerned with the quality of her workouts, not the quantity

Posted in Coaching, High Performance, Periodization, Professional Athletes | Comments Off

Advanced Periodization: Going from Age-Grouper to Professional (Part 3/5)

In part 2 of 5, I discussed classical periodization in more detail and laid out the major limiters that are associated with it. Now, I’ll get into the thought process I used while designing Kristi’s training program for 2011 that would avoid the common pitfalls of classical periodization.

In 2010, Kristi had been training between 20-30 hours a week and was having a moderate amount of success with high volume and high intensity workouts. It was clear to me that she was spending a lot of time training and not seeing the results that she was seeking. It became my challenge to design a training program for her that would ensure the following:

  1. She would have the correct amount of energy for each workout, based on the specific workload demands.
  2. She would be able to recover properly between workouts since different physiological systems require different recovery periods
  3. Ensure she would have compatible workouts from a neuromuscular, energetic demand and/or technical complexity.
  4. Ensure her workouts were highly sport-specific in order to meet the demands of the large amounts of training stimulus she would need to earn her pro card.
  5. To provide her with a training program that would allow for multiple peaks throughout 2011.

With those goals in mind, I designed her training program using an alternative to the traditional periodization that was mentioned above. My goals for Kristi’s training program were:

  1. Focus her workloads on a minimal number of targets.
  2. Design three smaller “blocks” of training per mesocycle instead of 9+ prescribed blocks of the traditional periodization model.
  3. Shorten her mesocycles (2-4 weeks) to allow for physiological, biomechanical and morphological adaptations without the accumulation of excessive fatigue.
  4. Allow her to peak for multiple races in 2011.

That being said, here’s a short recap of the first five months of  Kristi’s 2011 season: I started working with Kristi at the end of January 2011, the same day the she finished her last treatment from a serious illness. Over the next 3 months, Kristi would suffer an injured calf muscle, severe case of bronchitis, and to top it off, three cracked ribs and a bruised lung in the first 50 meters of an ITU race in Mazatlan. She was healthy enough to start training in early May, with less than a month to prepare for 4-5 races across the country in May and June.  It was clear that she was not going to be able to get any real training while driving across the country, so we used that time to simply get in as much training as we could, making the best use of what we had available.

We reset her training on Monday, July 4th, which left us 12 weeks until the big race in Buffalo, NY with the Chicago Triathlon as a tune-up race at the end of August.

In part 4, I’ll dig into the concepts behind block periodization to include some of the key early workouts that laid the foundations for Kristi’s success.

Posted in Break Through Athletes, Coaching, Periodization, Professional Athletes, Racing | Comments Off

Advanced Periodization: Going from Age-Grouper to Professional (Part 2/5)

In part 1, I discussed the basics of classical periodization in triathlon and went a little bit  into the type of training that Kristi had done in 2010. Here in part 2, we’ll get more into the specifics of classical periodization (aerobic endurance, muscular endurance, etc…) and point out the major flaws with such an approach in triathlon.

Joe Friel has written a series of outstanding intro-level books on endurance sports training, where he termed the mesocycles as base, build and peak phases that most athletes and coaches are familiar with. He then sequenced targets in a very common sense fashion (figure 2) with the general abilities of endurance, force, and speed skills and the more specific or advanced abilities such as muscular endurance, anaerobic endurance and power.

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 2: Pillars of triathlon training

Traditional periodization promotes a methodical approach designed to develop multiple targeted abilities at the same time (endurance, speed skills and force in the “base” phase). This basic sequencing, from general to specific, which is promoted by traditional periodization, also provides its major limitations to everyone except low-level athletes!

Kristi was trying desperately to develop an aerobic base, muscle strength, balancing hormone levels in training, developing motor skills, general speed, technique, mental and technical skills.  Each of these targets requires specific physiological, morphological and psychological adaptations, many of which are not compatible. The lack of compatibility of multi-targeted training causes a conflicting response to training, which is not advantageous.

The major limitations to the traditional periodization that Kristi was using include:

  1. Conflicting physiological responses produced by “mixed” training directed at multiple athletic abilities.
  2. Excessive fatigue elicited by prolonged periods of multi-targeted training.
  3. Insufficient training stimulus from medium to low concentrations that are typical in mixed training.
  4. The inability to peak for multiple races throughout an entire season.

It’s pretty clear to see: by approaching training in this method, the athlete is limiting their ability to reach their full potential through training. In part 3, I’ll get a lot more into how I  approached her training program in 2011 to remove the major limiters above and a summary of the first half of2011.

Posted in Coaching, High Performance, Periodization, Professional Athletes, Training | Comments Off

Advanced Periodization: Going from Age-Grouper to Professional (Part 1/5)

This is post 1 of a 5 part series on the theory of periodization, both old and new, told in the context of professional triathlete Kristi Johnson (@Kristi3D) and her journey from age-grouper to professional.

Earlier this year, I started coaching Phoenix area age-group athlete Kristi Johnson, whom consistently finished in the top-10 in most of the local races. When we first met in January of 2011 to discuss coaching, she made it very clear that her goal was to earn her elite triathlete license (“pro card”) from USA Triathlon by the end of 2011… which she did in September! In this five-part series, I will explain the advanced approach I took to her training that took a good age group athlete and built her into a professional triathlete.

One of the first questions I asked Kristi: tell me about your training over the last 12 months. She described the “periodized” approach she had taken to her training that she had picked up from a listening to a few of the Phoenix area coaches and people talking at some of the local triathlon shops. She described building up a huge base early in the year and then adding intensity to her workouts as she got closer to race day… this is what everyone was doing so it had to be right.

Periodization is a term in endurance sports that is used frequently by coaches and athletes alike to describe how they break up their training. By definition, periodization is breaking up larger periods of time into smaller, more manageable chunks of time to maximize the training during the smaller blocks. Figure 1 illustrates that classical periodization models (linear, reverse or undulating). The full year (macrocycle) is broken up into the smaller and more manageable chunks which are referred to as mesocycles, which are also referred to as phases (base, build, etc…).

 

 

 

 

Figure 1: Traditional perdiodization scheme

This style of periodization was first used in the 1940’s by the Soviet Union and first published by Tudor Bompa in the 1960’s. It has be written about in hundreds of triathlon books and taught to coaches by USA Cycling and USA Triathlon for as long as they have been certifying coaches to provide them with a basic set of guidelines for structuring and planning training.  By proposing a sequencing of different targets or goals in training such as general to specific or extensive to intensive provides a good starting point for a new coach.

In part two, I will go into the basics of classical periodization and it’s main limiters, which is why I chose to take a different approach with Kristi in 2011.

Posted in Break Through Athletes, Coaching, High Performance, Periodization, Professional Athletes, Training, Triathlon | Comments Off

Going for Pro: The Pursuit of Excellence (part 2)

OK, here’s part two of the article, which gets a lot more into the details of Kristi’s 2011 season. Hopefully you will find something in this series that will assist you in your training.

Confidence

In general, this is something an athlete either has or they do not. Levels of confidence can certainly fluctuate with racing and training, but there has to be a baseline level for success. My general rule of thumb is, success breeds confidence, with the other side of that coin being confidence not only influences but breeds success.

Confidence was my biggest challenge with Kristi, especially at the beginning. She was used to training 20-30 hours a week; I initially limited her to 12-15 hours, eventually working our way up to around 20 hours per week. She was used to hours and hours of riding and then miles and miles of running… super high volume with intensity being added in as she felt. This is NOT how I operate as a coach- aerobic training has a limit, especially for higher caliber athletes. Our initial goal was to develop a decent aerobic base (aerobic endurance) and then started on muscular endurance. The first race Kristi was set for was the Lake Havasu triathlon in March with the first big event being the Continental Cup race in Mazatlan, Mexico. We used a combination of output:input calculations and fatigue rates to determine when to add in the more sports-specific training.

Kristi was, at best, skeptical of the training once we got rolling at the end of January. Her overall volume was decreased by 25-40% compared to what she was used to, with a lot of interval work on a CompuTrainer and treadmill.  She was now using the full array of training tools, which was also new to her, but ultimately the difference maker.

Here are three examples throughout the 2011 season illustrating the ebb and flow of confidence as the season progressed. The first half of 2011 turned out to be mess, an injured calf muscle in mid-February allowed us to swim, but cycling was painful when intensity was added in (see motivation and discipline above). She was not able to run pain-free until close to the end of March. That being said, in early March, we retested her functional threshold power (FTP) out on the Beeline, with Kristi having very little confidence prior to the test due to the new style of training. I parked the car at the gas station and she headed out for the time trial lacking confidence. When she returned, she had a huge smile on her face, having ridden the loop at least 5 minutes faster than she had ever ridden it and upon analyzing the power file, she had raised her FTP by close to 15% in just over 45 days! She headed into the race at Lake Havasu with a high level of confidence and ended up setting a new PR with haphazard training due to the calf injury.

Close to the end of March, Kristi came down with a nasty case of Bronchitis, which killed most all useful training for the two weeks leading up to and through the ITU race in Mazatlan. After cracking three ribs and bruising a lung and her liver 50 meters into the swim in Mazatlan, she was restricted to cycling only for most of April and it was relatively low intensity for the first couple weeks since breathing was a serious issue. Roughly two weeks before Wildflower, Kristi was able to get back in the pool and roughly 10 days before Wildflower, she was able to withstand the jarring of running. Needless to say, she had a very poor result at Wildflower; to say her confidence was at an all time low would be an understatement.

At this point, we had roughly 25 days of training before we left for a 54-day road trip where she would first toe the line in the Capital of Texas triathlon in Austin at the end of May. We did what we could to prepare her to compete for a top-3 finish in Austin and the other events on the schedule.

Training for triathlon is a process that takes time. On May 1st, we had three solid weeks to train in Phoenix then we had to hit the road. At best, it was the equivalent of cramming for a comprehensive final exam. We used a lot of high-intensity interval training to get the most out of her time, which provided some quality results, but the main question going into CapTex would be if three weeks of training was enough. Ultimately, Kristi finished in the top-20 in Austin, which was a major positive, but there was still a large gap between where she was and where she needed to be for a pro card. When she crossed the finish line, she was happy with her time, but not her placing. The most interesting thing she said was that her effort would have won her just about any triathlon in Arizona that she had raced in the past, but was only good enough for a top-20 finish on a national stage. This was another big hit to her confidence, even though she fully understood why the result was so poor. It is my opinion, it was after that race, in which Kristi had hit a new low in confidence, she started to make the changes mentally, which eventually earned her a pro card in September.

After CapTex, we were left getting in what training we could as we drove across country. After a so-so race outside of Chicago in early June, in conjunction with the cancelation of the next race in Monroe, WA, we decided to reset her training. She spent the next 3 weeks reestablishing her aerobic base with the goal of racing a half-iron distance event in Bend, OR at the end of June. Considering she had been cramming for an Olympic distance triathlon, her results were not too bad at the HIM distance.

At this point, neither Kristi nor I were really happy with the results from the first half of the season, but that had to be taken with a grain of salt. In reality, a calf injury, bronchitis and cracked ribs had pretty much destroyed the first half of the season. I’ll dedicate another couple posts to the training decisions that I made as a coach since at this point they seem to be erratic and lacking results.

After Bend, we spent a week in Monterey, CA coaching at a youth and junior Skills Camp and then a long weekend in Coronado, CA which was time “off” for Kristi, with no organized training. At this point, as the coach, I was not the slightest bit concerned with where we were at and was very confident that as soon as we returned to Phoenix and Kristi could get into a regular training routine we would not have a problem. Kristi on the other hand, was not quite as confident.  After a long conversation, Kristi begrudgingly acknowledged the lack of results was due to the rash of injuries and illness.

When we got back to Phoenix, we were finally able to get into a solid training routine to build her up specifically for the last race of the season, the Nickel City triathlon in Buffalo, NY.

The most noticeable change in Kristi’s confidence came in early August after a swim test and then again in late August after the Chicago triathlon. I had Kristi do another 200/800 swim test on August 1st; she was not very happy when she got out of the pool. She thought her times were slower, but after we looked at her swim times all the way back to when we first met, she had indeed had a major breakthrough in the swim! In seven months, with a lot of work on her technique and some well written swim workouts, Kristi was able to cut close to 15 seconds off her 200 time (anaerobic portion) and one minute off her 800 time (aerobic portion, over 10 seconds per 100). This test was the tipping point, for Kristi’s confidence, she was now firing on all cylinders with 8 weeks until Buffalo!

She went to Chicago to race in the Chicago triathlon at the end of August, where she set a new PR on the bike by 6 minutes with fierce head and crosswinds on the entire ride. At this point, we entered into the realization phase (peak phase for all of the classical periodization fans) and Kristi was flying.

The end result: Kristi earned her pro card in Buffalo, finishing third in a field full of females that were there for the elite development race and a full age group field. In Buffalo, she got off the bike in 4th place, behind three elite development girls; afterwards, she said she never had a doubt she would run them down. With four miles to go on the run, another elite development girl was starting to close the gap on Kristi. Instead of freaking out, she said she was able to relax and fall into a solid pace that not only held that girl off, but ultimately extended her lead by over a minute. Not only did her motivation, dedication and training pay off, the confidence she had built up since July is what made all the difference.

 

Focus/Purpose

Focus and purpose is the next attribute that I’m concerned with. Focus is something that an athlete either can or cannot do initially, but can be improved with solid coaching and guidance. Purpose on the other hand requires a deeper understanding of exercise science, and is helpful to have a coach that understands the science. As a coach who provides continuing education seminars and webinars for triathlon coaches around the globe- understanding the science behind the coaching will make all the difference for an athlete. Understanding topics such as pacing, thermoregulatory feedback, metabolic rate and fatigue will take an athlete from being average to good, or from good to professional!

With Kristi, there was no doubt she could focus, that was simple. Kristi’s understanding of training was… let’s say, basic. This was not Kristi’s fault, when we first met and started working together, she was not a coach. She was operating off what she had heard at the local tri shop, from talking to coaches in the valley and other athletes she met. One of my largest challenges was teaching Kristi about how to train at the next level; to train and recover like a professional.

As I mentioned above, the antiquated approach to periodization was the first thing that had to be changed. From there, we worked diligently to understand topics such as recovery, pacing, fatigue, tapering and training/racing intensity. Kristi questioned me every step of the way and picked up on it quickly, realizing that each workout and the subsequent recovery created a single brick.

From there, it was up to Kristi to keep building the bricks and putting them together to create a wall, which was evident by her putting together solid races this fall and achieving her goal for the season!

 

Patience

Without a doubt, this was and still is the most challenging for Kristi. She wants results and she wants them now, even though she understands that training for triathlon and getting faster is a process, it takes long-term planning and patience. Malcom Gladwell wrote an outstanding book “Outliers,” where he argues the 10,000 hour rule: it takes roughly 10,000 hours of doing something to become one of the best in a given field. In triathlon, that can be 10-12 years… Kristi has been racing for the last seven. Looking more closely at patience, there is long-term and short-term patience.

Long-Term Patience

In triathlon, this is simply letting the training process take place, which takes time. You cannot cram 12 weeks of training into 8 and expect to see the same results.

Short-Term Patience

With the athletes I coach, especially the elite/professionals like Kristi, there are three parts of the short-term patience that I preach religiously to them: there are 3 things an athlete has a lot of control over, focus on them:

1. The quality of the current workout

Each athlete, to some extent, has the ability to control the quality of each session in terms of the effort they put out and the mental aspects/motivation of each session

2. Food/Fuel Choices

Each athlete has the ability to control what they eat and drink on a daily basis. The ability to fuel your body before and after a workout and the regular food choices can make a huge difference… crap in = crap out

3. Rest and Recovery

The third thing an athlete can control is the amount of sleep they get and how they recover between workouts. In order to see an increase in performance, an athlete has to recover from workout-to-workout.

Kristi did an exceptionally good job controlling the three variables above, which, in my opinion, was the final push she needed to earn her pro card!

Posted in Coaching, High Performance, Racing, Triathlon | Comments Off